Garrich TorresCONSULTANTS
العربيةLet’s talk

What would you like to improve?

All solutionsSee guided examples
All demos

DOCUMENT INTELLIGENCE

Different documents. One reviewable picture.

Inspect a property document pack or compare contract clauses with a firm’s playbook. Follow the evidence, decide what needs changing and prepare a draft that preserves your review.

Try the interactive demo

For property, technical and legal review teams

Find the gaps in a property pack.

The registry and survey disagree on area. The occupancy paperwork is incomplete. Reviewers need the documents together before deciding what to request.

A working exampleFictional data · fixed starting point

Registry extract · Measured survey · Occupancy file · Energy certificate

Do the documents for Courtyard House, Unit 14 agree?

What the evidence shows

Registry: 124 m². Survey: 132 m². The 8 m² gap needs technical review. Occupancy approval stays unresolved: the pack contains an application, not a final certificate.

Registry extractMeasured surveyOccupancy applicationEnergy certificate
Recorded area124 m²

Registry extract for the unit.

Measured area132 m²

Measured survey; basis still to be checked.

Difference to investigate8 m²

A question for review, not a finding of noncompliance.

Explore the questions that matter

Why do the two areas differ?

The documents do not say. The registry and survey may use different measurement boundaries or definitions. An architect should reconcile them and record the reason for the 8 m² difference.

Registry extractMeasured survey
Does the property have occupancy approval?

The pack does not show it. The occupancy file confirms an application only, and the energy certificate does not establish permission. This does not mean a permit is invalid; a lawyer should request authoritative status evidence.

Occupancy applicationEnergy certificate
What if the survey were missing?

Only the registry area would remain, so no difference could be calculated. The review would record the missing survey and request one before any comparison.

Registry extract

Supporting records (4)

Registry extract124 m² recorded for Unit 14 in this fictional extract.
Property
Courtyard House, Unit 14
Recorded area
124 m²

Fictional extract supplied for comparison.

Measured survey132 m² in the fictional survey; check the measurement basis before drawing conclusions.
Property
Same unit as the registry
Measured area
132 m²

Fictional survey. Check its measurement basis against the registry definition.

Occupancy applicationApplication received; not a final certificate or evidence of approval.
Acknowledged status
Application received

Not a final occupancy certificate or evidence of approval.

Energy certificateSupporting evidence only; does not establish occupancy permission or explain the area difference.
Evidence role
Supporting document only

Does not establish occupancy permission or explain the area difference.

Preview the next step

Awaiting human review

Technical and legal document review

  1. Architect reconciles the registry and survey measurement basis.
  2. Lawyer requests the final occupancy certificate or authoritative status confirmation.
  3. Record each finding with its source and the reviewer’s conclusion.
  4. Review both findings before preparing a draft dossier; retain any unresolved questions in the draft.

This is not legal advice, a technical certification or approval to proceed. A qualified professional must verify the original documents and applicable requirements.

Preview only. Nothing is sent or changed.

Keep findings next to evidence

Every question links back to the document it came from.

Make gaps visible

Missing or incomplete records are shown, not filled in by guesswork.

Route each issue to the right professional

Technical and legal questions go to the people qualified to answer them.

How this would work with your team

  1. Classify the pack

    Identify each document type and what it can and cannot establish.

  2. Compare with sources

    Extract the agreed fields and surface conflicts and missing evidence, each linked to its document.

  3. Review with professionals

    Architects and lawyers inspect the evidence and decide; the draft keeps findings and unresolved questions visible.

Fixed fictional property pack. No uploads, hosted data room, legal verification or open-ended AI answer. The full workspace below is a separate simulator.

Explore the full workspace

Independent sandbox. Changes here do not change the fixed example above. Use the controls below to explore other states.

Interactive demo · Sample data · No uploads or live AI.

Agent-assisted document due diligence

A shared evidence workspace for architects and lawyers.

PROPERTY CASECourtyard House · Unit 14DEMO-014
  1. ClassifyIdentify document typesWaiting
  2. ExtractRead fields with sourcesWaiting
  3. CompareSurface gaps and conflictsWaiting
  4. Human reviewAcknowledge each issueWaiting
  5. Draft reportGenerate after reviewWaiting

Interactive controls become available when this demo loads.

Evidence review

One case, two professional perspectives. Inspect the source before acknowledging the issue.

The evidence comes first.

Run the pipeline to reveal the cross-document findings. The process stops for a person to inspect the evidence before a draft can be generated.

  • Every finding links to its source document.
  • Missing evidence stays visible.
  • Professional decisions remain with people.

Follow the evidence

From a document pack to a professional review.

Fixed four-document example. Changes in the interactive workspace do not change this explanation.

  1. Source

    Classify the pack and retain a reference to each source.

    • Registry extractdemo-registry.pdf
    • Measured surveydemo-survey.pdf
    • Energy certificatedemo-energy.pdf
    • Occupancy applicationdemo-occupancy.pdf

  2. Extraction

    Extract the stated areas and keep each value linked to its document.

    Recorded area
    124 m²Registry extract
    Measured area
    132 m²Measured survey

  3. Verification

    Compare measurement boundaries and definitions. A difference is a question to investigate, not proof of noncompliance.

    8 m²Difference to investigate

  4. Exception

    The occupancy receipt records an application. A final certificate or authoritative status is still needed.

    2Open evidence issues

  5. Human review

    An architect reconciles the areas. A lawyer requests the final certificate or authoritative status.

    Draft — professional review required

    Acknowledgement records your review. It does not resolve an issue or approve the property.

Law firms

Review this contract

Compare a service agreement with a firm playbook. Decide what to change, then export the reviewed wording and open departures.

Synthetic service agreement SVC-DEMO-01 · local demonstration · no uploads

Source documents are readable below. Interactive review becomes available when the controls load.

Payment timing

Inspect original and playbook

Agreement source: SVC-DEMO-01 §4

Original wording

The client will pay each invoice within 90 days of receipt.

Playbook reference: PLAYBOOK-01 P1

Firm playbook rule

The firm’s example position is payment within 30 days of invoice receipt.

Deviation

The proposed agreement allows 60 more days than the example playbook.

Proposed wording

The client will pay each invoice within 30 days of receipt.

Reason for the proposal

Replace the 90-day term with the firm’s stated 30-day position.

Decision required

Changes to scope

Inspect original and playbook

Agreement source: SVC-DEMO-01 §6

Original wording

Any change requested by the client becomes part of the services when the supplier receives the request.

Playbook reference: PLAYBOOK-01 P2

Firm playbook rule

Changes require written agreement on scope, fees and delivery dates before work starts.

Deviation

Receiving a request commits the supplier without agreeing its cost or schedule.

Proposed wording

A change becomes part of the services only after both parties agree its scope, fees and delivery dates in writing.

Reason for the proposal

Require an agreed change before expanding the work.

Decision required

Notice and handover

Inspect original and playbook

Agreement source: SVC-DEMO-01 §9

Original wording

The client may terminate immediately at any time. The supplier must complete all remaining services.

Playbook reference: PLAYBOOK-01 P3

Firm playbook rule

Either party may terminate with 30 days’ written notice and an agreed handover for work in progress.

Deviation

The clause gives one party immediate termination without specifying how to handle the remaining work.

Proposed wording

Either party may terminate on 30 days’ written notice. The parties will agree a written handover plan for services already in progress.

Reason for the proposal

Define mutual notice and a documented handover rather than an open-ended completion obligation.

Decision required

0 of 3 clauses decided. Complete every decision to generate a draft.

Plan a pilot

Inputs, deliverables and review
Inputs
One permitted document pack or contract, required sources and review questions or firm playbook.
Deliverables
Source-linked findings, missing-document checks and a reviewed report or wording comparison.
Acceptance cases
Conflicting evidence, missing sources, accepted or rejected wording and edits after review.
Reviewer
Qualified reviewer verifies originals and resolves legal or technical questions.
Next step
Name one document pack and its intended review in your enquiry.
Implementation guide

Make your document workflow easier to review.

Discuss your document workflow